Mo & Krill

Patch 2026-09-29.

Summary

Win rate 49.0% ± 0.3 (n=111,100). Grade B. vs average -1.0 pp.

Kills / deaths / assists per game: 5.9 / 6.4 / 15.0. Net worth per minute: 1,184.8. Average match length: 36.1 min.

Lane highlights: this patch, all ranks, clean matches, all purchases. Ranked by observed match win rate among assigned-lane opponents with enough games; differences use this hero's overall rate in the same population.

Best observed lane opponent: Deadman Danny — 56.3% (likely range 54.8% to 57.8%), +7.3 pp vs hero overall, 4,262 games.

Worst observed lane opponent: Seven — 44.1% (likely range 42.9% to 45.3%), -5.0 pp vs hero overall, 6,376 games.

Top items and bottom items by phase

Bought before 10 min

Top items: Sprint Boots +0.7 pp, Cold Front +0.9 pp

Bottom items: Extra Regen -3.3 pp, Quicksilver Reload -1.4 pp, Mystic Burst -1.3 pp

10–20 min

Top items: Spirit Resilience +1.6 pp, Healbane +0.8 pp, Warp Stone +0.5 pp

Bottom items: Trophy Collector -3.8 pp, Enduring Speed -1.5 pp, Cold Front -0.8 pp

20 min or later

Top items: Mystic Vulnerability +2.2 pp, Escalating Exposure +1.9 pp, Spirit Burn +2.2 pp

Bottom items: Plated Armor -3.0 pp, Improved Spirit -2.4 pp, Transcendent Cooldown -2.0 pp

Ranked by the low end of each likely range, from items with enough games. See Win rate impact below for the full tables.

View the most popular and highest win rate builds for this hero.

By rank tier

Show the rank table

Tier	Games	Win rate	Pick share	Ban rate
All tiers	111,100	49.0% ± 0.3 (n=111,100)	2.4% (n=4,643,618)	2.2% (n=387,129)
1 Initiate	5,379	48.7% ± 1.3 (n=5,379)	1.9% (n=286,633)	2.1% (n=26,191)
2 Seeker	11,746	49.9% ± 0.9 (n=11,746)	2.1% (n=567,145)	2.0% (n=53,624)
3 Acolyte	12,327	49.8% ± 0.9 (n=12,327)	2.3% (n=538,601)	1.8% (n=49,318)
4 Sentinel	10,767	49.5% ± 0.9 (n=10,767)	2.4% (n=454,663)	2.0% (n=40,935)
5 Mystic	10,382	49.8% ± 1.0 (n=10,382)	2.5% (n=412,948)	1.8% (n=37,362)
6 Ritualist	10,630	49.1% ± 1.0 (n=10,630)	2.5% (n=417,480)	1.6% (n=36,413)
7 Emissary	10,354	48.6% ± 1.0 (n=10,354)	2.6% (n=403,465)	1.5% (n=36,580)
8 Oracle	13,746	48.9% ± 0.8 (n=13,746)	2.5% (n=546,368)	2.3% (n=42,649)
9 Phantom	11,496	48.4% ± 0.9 (n=11,496)	2.7% (n=432,077)	3.5% (n=40,417)
10 Ascendant	5,404	49.1% ± 1.3 (n=5,404)	2.5% (n=213,670)	2.8% (n=16,821)
11 Eternus	1,709	51.0% ± 2.4 (n=1,709)	2.2% (n=78,077)	4.3% (n=6,819)

Win rate by match length

Show the match length table

Match length	Win rate
under 30 min	47.7% ± 0.7 (n=20,348)
30–40 min	49.0% ± 0.4 (n=62,563)
40 min or more	50.1% ± 0.6 (n=28,189)

Win rate impact

Show the win rate impact tables

Computed 2026-10-23 00:36 UTC. All ranks, clean matches.

Bought before 10 min

Show 28 rows with too little data

Comparison: Bought before 10 min. Up to 10 rows per tier, eligible alternatives first. Purchase shares: 111,100 hero appearances.
Item	Comparison tier	Bought in	Win rate when bought	Win rate impact	Likely range	Distinct matches	Data covered	Evidence
Sprint Boots	Tier 1 / 5 alternatives (group 1)	67.6%	49.9% ± 0.4 (n=75,119)	+0.7 pp	+0.4 to +1.1 pp	110,560	99.7%	likely helps
Mystic Expansion	Tier 1 / 5 alternatives (group 1)	34.6%	49.3% ± 0.5 (n=38,431)	-0.3 pp	-0.8 to +0.1 pp	110,560	99.7%	unclear
Extra Spirit	Tier 1 / 5 alternatives (group 1)	29.8%	50.7% ± 0.5 (n=33,063)	-0.9 pp	-1.7 to -0.0 pp	110,560	99.7%	likely hurts
Mystic Burst	Tier 1 / 5 alternatives (group 1)	96.5%	49.2% ± 0.3 (n=107,216)	-1.3 pp	-1.8 to -0.8 pp	110,560	99.7%	likely hurts
Extra Regen	Tier 1 / 5 alternatives (group 1)	12.3%	46.3% ± 0.8 (n=13,654)	-3.3 pp	-4.1 to -2.5 pp	110,560	99.7%	likely hurts
Cold Front	Tier 2 / 3 alternatives (group 2)	47.8%	51.4% ± 0.4 (n=53,149)	+0.9 pp	+0.2 to +1.5 pp	101,473	100.0%	likely helps
Trophy Collector	Tier 2 / 3 alternatives (group 2)	61.7%	50.8% ± 0.4 (n=68,575)	+0.2 pp	-0.2 to +0.5 pp	101,473	100.0%	unclear
Quicksilver Reload	Tier 2 / 3 alternatives (group 2)	64.8%	49.2% ± 0.4 (n=71,953)	-1.4 pp	-1.7 to -1.0 pp	101,473	100.0%	likely hurts
Spirit Strike	Tier 1 / 5 alternatives (group 1)	0.2%	53.4% ± 7.3 (n=176)	—	—	110,560	99.7%	not enough data
Rapid Rounds	Tier 1 / 5 alternatives (group 1)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=55)	—	—	110,560	99.7%	not enough data
Monster Rounds	Tier 1 / 5 alternatives (group 1)	5.1%	45.2% ± 1.3 (n=5,614)	—	—	110,560	99.7%	not enough data
Close Quarters	Tier 1 / 5 alternatives (group 1)	0.6%	45.2% ± 3.8 (n=670)	—	—	110,560	99.7%	not enough data
Melee Lifesteal	Tier 1 / 5 alternatives (group 1)	0.2%	43.4% ± 6.4 (n=228)	—	—	110,560	99.7%	not enough data
Improved Spirit	Tier 2 / 3 alternatives (group 2)	7.2%	49.0% ± 1.1 (n=8,026)	—	—	101,473	100.0%	not enough data
Melee Charge	Tier 2 / 3 alternatives (group 2)	0.1%	insufficient data (n=62)	—	—	101,473	100.0%	not enough data
Stalker	Tier 2 / 3 alternatives (group 2)	0.3%	43.2% ± 5.7 (n=285)	—	—	101,473	100.0%	not enough data
Spirit Shielding	Tier 2 / 3 alternatives (group 2)	0.5%	47.4% ± 4.1 (n=563)	—	—	101,473	100.0%	not enough data
Compress Cooldown	Tier 2 / 3 alternatives (group 2)	1.9%	49.6% ± 2.1 (n=2,154)	—	—	101,473	100.0%	not enough data
Active Reload	Tier 2 / 3 alternatives (group 2)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=5)	—	—	101,473	100.0%	not enough data
Slowing Bullets	Tier 2 / 3 alternatives (group 2)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=34)	—	—	101,473	100.0%	not enough data
Torment Pulse	Tier 3 / 1 alternatives (group 3)	16.5%	53.1% ± 0.7 (n=18,380)	—	—	18,371	100.0%	not enough data
Stamina Mastery	Tier 3 / 1 alternatives (group 3)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=2)	—	—	18,371	100.0%	not enough data
Majestic Leap	Tier 3 / 1 alternatives (group 3)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=3)	—	—	18,371	100.0%	not enough data
Silence Wave	Tier 3 / 1 alternatives (group 3)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=2)	—	—	18,371	100.0%	not enough data
Cultist Sacrifice	Tier 3 / 1 alternatives (group 3)	0.2%	40.1% ± 7.0 (n=187)	—	—	18,371	100.0%	not enough data
Tesla Bullets	Tier 3 / 1 alternatives (group 3)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=2)	—	—	18,371	100.0%	not enough data
Veil Walker	Tier 3 / 1 alternatives (group 3)	0.1%	56.8% ± 8.3 (n=132)	—	—	18,371	100.0%	not enough data
Greater Expansion	Tier 3 / 1 alternatives (group 3)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=48)	—	—	18,371	100.0%	not enough data
Lifestrike	Tier 3 / 1 alternatives (group 3)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=4)	—	—	18,371	100.0%	not enough data
Knockdown	Tier 3 / 1 alternatives (group 3)	0.1%	insufficient data (n=81)	—	—	18,371	100.0%	not enough data
Phantom Strike	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=5)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Scourge	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=1)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Boundless Spirit	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=3)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Escalating Exposure	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=1)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Witchmail	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=1)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Arctic Blast	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=5)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data

10–20 min

Show 24 rows with too little data Show all 16 rows

Comparison: 10–20 min. Up to 10 rows per tier, eligible alternatives first. Purchase shares: 111,100 hero appearances.
Item	Comparison tier	Bought in	Win rate when bought	Win rate impact	Likely range	Distinct matches	Data covered	Evidence
Extra Spirit	Tier 1 / 2 alternatives (group 1)	27.4%	48.9% ± 0.6 (n=30,426)	-0.1 pp	-0.4 to +0.1 pp	38,266	100.0%	unclear
Extra Health	Tier 1 / 2 alternatives (group 1)	11.2%	49.2% ± 0.9 (n=12,477)	+0.2 pp	-0.4 to +0.8 pp	38,266	100.0%	unclear
Healbane	Tier 2 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	45.7%	49.9% ± 0.4 (n=50,774)	+0.8 pp	+0.4 to +1.1 pp	99,693	100.0%	likely helps
Compress Cooldown	Tier 2 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	29.5%	52.2% ± 0.5 (n=32,758)	+0.1 pp	-0.4 to +0.7 pp	99,693	100.0%	unclear
Improved Spirit	Tier 2 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	27.6%	51.2% ± 0.6 (n=30,670)	-0.1 pp	-0.6 to +0.4 pp	99,693	100.0%	unclear
Duration Extender	Tier 2 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	20.0%	52.1% ± 0.7 (n=22,273)	-0.2 pp	-0.8 to +0.5 pp	99,693	100.0%	unclear
Cold Front	Tier 2 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	24.7%	47.0% ± 0.6 (n=27,448)	-0.8 pp	-1.3 to -0.2 pp	99,693	100.0%	likely hurts
Enduring Speed	Tier 2 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	17.5%	47.3% ± 0.7 (n=19,495)	-1.5 pp	-2.0 to -0.9 pp	99,693	100.0%	likely hurts
Trophy Collector	Tier 2 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	13.3%	44.8% ± 0.8 (n=14,762)	-3.8 pp	-5.5 to -2.2 pp	99,693	100.0%	likely hurts
Spirit Resilience	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 3)	10.7%	52.8% ± 0.9 (n=11,848)	+1.6 pp	+0.8 to +2.5 pp	103,097	100.0%	likely helps
Warp Stone	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 3)	27.9%	51.9% ± 0.6 (n=30,969)	+0.5 pp	+0.0 to +0.9 pp	103,097	100.0%	likely helps
Torment Pulse	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 3)	68.9%	49.6% ± 0.4 (n=76,527)	-0.4 pp	-0.6 to -0.1 pp	103,097	100.0%	likely hurts
Fortitude	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 3)	17.4%	51.0% ± 0.7 (n=19,332)	-0.3 pp	-0.9 to +0.3 pp	103,097	100.0%	unclear
Tankbuster	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 3)	23.8%	55.4% ± 0.6 (n=26,391)	-0.7 pp	-1.3 to +0.0 pp	103,097	100.0%	unclear
Superior Cooldown	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 3)	16.6%	55.0% ± 0.7 (n=18,495)	-0.6 pp	-1.4 to +0.2 pp	103,097	100.0%	unclear
Superior Duration	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 3)	13.7%	55.6% ± 0.8 (n=15,246)	-0.6 pp	-1.5 to +0.3 pp	103,097	100.0%	unclear
Spirit Strike	Tier 1 / 2 alternatives (group 1)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=52)	—	—	38,266	100.0%	not enough data
Rapid Rounds	Tier 1 / 2 alternatives (group 1)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=30)	—	—	38,266	100.0%	not enough data
Mystic Expansion	Tier 1 / 2 alternatives (group 1)	2.6%	48.1% ± 1.8 (n=2,871)	—	—	38,266	100.0%	not enough data
Monster Rounds	Tier 1 / 2 alternatives (group 1)	0.7%	44.9% ± 3.4 (n=829)	—	—	38,266	100.0%	not enough data
Close Quarters	Tier 1 / 2 alternatives (group 1)	0.1%	36.1% ± 7.2 (n=166)	—	—	38,266	100.0%	not enough data
Melee Lifesteal	Tier 1 / 2 alternatives (group 1)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=45)	—	—	38,266	100.0%	not enough data
Mystic Regeneration	Tier 1 / 2 alternatives (group 1)	9.2%	49.1% ± 1.0 (n=10,240)	—	—	38,266	100.0%	not enough data
Extended Magazine	Tier 1 / 2 alternatives (group 1)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=48)	—	—	38,266	100.0%	not enough data
Melee Charge	Tier 2 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	0.1%	insufficient data (n=78)	—	—	99,693	100.0%	not enough data
Quicksilver Reload	Tier 2 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	2.4%	41.8% ± 1.9 (n=2,635)	—	—	99,693	100.0%	not enough data
Stalker	Tier 2 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	0.1%	45.8% ± 8.8 (n=118)	—	—	99,693	100.0%	not enough data
Stamina Mastery	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 3)	0.1%	insufficient data (n=72)	—	—	103,097	100.0%	not enough data
Majestic Leap	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 3)	0.1%	45.0% ± 9.6 (n=100)	—	—	103,097	100.0%	not enough data
Silence Wave	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 3)	0.1%	40.4% ± 8.9 (n=114)	—	—	103,097	100.0%	not enough data
Spirit Burn	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.4%	65.5% ± 4.3 (n=461)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Glass Cannon	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=3)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Lightning Scroll	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=2)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Echo Shard	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=13)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Refresher	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=33)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Capacitor	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=2)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Crushing Fists	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=15)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Leech	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=15)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Transcendent Cooldown	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.6%	53.4% ± 3.6 (n=714)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Indomitable	Tier 4 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.1%	48.4% ± 8.5 (n=128)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data

20 min or later

Show 19 rows with too little data Show all 21 rows

Comparison: 20 min or later. Up to 10 rows per tier, eligible alternatives first. Purchase shares: 111,100 hero appearances.
Item	Comparison tier	Bought in	Win rate when bought	Win rate impact	Likely range	Distinct matches	Data covered	Evidence
Mystic Vulnerability	Tier 2 / 4 alternatives (group 1)	21.3%	55.8% ± 0.6 (n=23,709)	+2.2 pp	+1.7 to +2.7 pp	64,749	99.5%	likely helps
Compress Cooldown	Tier 2 / 4 alternatives (group 1)	26.3%	50.1% ± 0.6 (n=29,170)	-0.0 pp	-0.4 to +0.3 pp	64,749	99.5%	unclear
Duration Extender	Tier 2 / 4 alternatives (group 1)	20.9%	50.2% ± 0.6 (n=23,241)	-0.2 pp	-0.6 to +0.3 pp	64,749	99.5%	unclear
Improved Spirit	Tier 2 / 4 alternatives (group 1)	16.0%	47.4% ± 0.7 (n=17,732)	-2.4 pp	-2.9 to -1.8 pp	64,749	99.5%	likely hurts
Greater Expansion	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	22.5%	51.6% ± 0.6 (n=24,955)	+1.1 pp	+0.6 to +1.6 pp	99,646	98.5%	likely helps
Superior Duration	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	43.4%	51.2% ± 0.4 (n=48,217)	+0.4 pp	+0.1 to +0.7 pp	99,646	98.5%	likely helps
Superior Cooldown	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	51.4%	51.3% ± 0.4 (n=57,103)	+0.3 pp	+0.1 to +0.6 pp	99,646	98.5%	likely helps
Tankbuster	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	52.1%	48.6% ± 0.4 (n=57,836)	-0.4 pp	-0.6 to -0.2 pp	99,646	98.5%	likely hurts
Spirit Resilience	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	24.4%	46.8% ± 0.6 (n=27,161)	-0.5 pp	-0.9 to -0.0 pp	99,646	98.5%	likely hurts
Warp Stone	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	12.0%	46.1% ± 0.8 (n=13,317)	-0.3 pp	-1.0 to +0.4 pp	99,646	98.5%	unclear
Radiant Regeneration	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	10.3%	47.3% ± 0.9 (n=11,441)	-1.1 pp	-2.0 to -0.3 pp	99,646	98.5%	likely hurts
Escalating Exposure	Tier 4 / 10 alternatives (group 3)	32.0%	59.6% ± 0.5 (n=35,596)	+1.9 pp	+1.6 to +2.3 pp	94,870	99.5%	likely helps
Spirit Burn	Tier 4 / 10 alternatives (group 3)	13.9%	60.0% ± 0.8 (n=15,479)	+2.2 pp	+1.6 to +2.8 pp	94,870	99.5%	likely helps
Witchmail	Tier 4 / 10 alternatives (group 3)	22.0%	57.1% ± 0.6 (n=24,463)	+1.2 pp	+0.8 to +1.6 pp	94,870	99.5%	likely helps
Scourge	Tier 4 / 10 alternatives (group 3)	33.5%	57.6% ± 0.5 (n=37,196)	+0.7 pp	+0.3 to +1.1 pp	94,870	99.5%	likely helps
Phantom Strike	Tier 4 / 10 alternatives (group 3)	15.0%	54.8% ± 0.8 (n=16,649)	+0.1 pp	-0.5 to +0.8 pp	94,870	99.5%	unclear
Arctic Blast	Tier 4 / 10 alternatives (group 3)	30.1%	55.5% ± 0.5 (n=33,460)	-0.8 pp	-1.1 to -0.4 pp	94,870	99.5%	likely hurts
Boundless Spirit	Tier 4 / 10 alternatives (group 3)	16.0%	56.5% ± 0.7 (n=17,801)	-1.0 pp	-1.6 to -0.5 pp	94,870	99.5%	likely hurts
Transcendent Cooldown	Tier 4 / 10 alternatives (group 3)	35.8%	56.4% ± 0.5 (n=39,774)	-2.0 pp	-2.3 to -1.7 pp	94,870	99.5%	likely hurts
Juggernaut	Tier 4 / 10 alternatives (group 3)	14.4%	53.2% ± 0.8 (n=16,040)	-1.8 pp	-2.4 to -1.2 pp	94,870	99.5%	likely hurts
Plated Armor	Tier 4 / 10 alternatives (group 3)	13.3%	50.2% ± 0.8 (n=14,789)	-3.0 pp	-3.6 to -2.3 pp	94,870	99.5%	likely hurts
Spirit Strike	Tier 1 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=18)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Rapid Rounds	Tier 1 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=19)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Mystic Expansion	Tier 1 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	1.6%	54.1% ± 2.3 (n=1,794)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Extra Spirit	Tier 1 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	4.1%	48.8% ± 1.5 (n=4,526)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Monster Rounds	Tier 1 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=37)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Close Quarters	Tier 1 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.1%	insufficient data (n=83)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Melee Lifesteal	Tier 1 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=22)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Mystic Regeneration	Tier 1 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	1.4%	43.9% ± 2.4 (n=1,587)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Extended Magazine	Tier 1 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=17)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Grit	Tier 1 / 0 alternatives (group 4)	1.8%	53.4% ± 2.2 (n=1,960)	—	—	0	0.0%	not enough data
Melee Charge	Tier 2 / 4 alternatives (group 1)	0.1%	insufficient data (n=60)	—	—	64,749	99.5%	not enough data
Quicksilver Reload	Tier 2 / 4 alternatives (group 1)	0.4%	42.8% ± 4.8 (n=411)	—	—	64,749	99.5%	not enough data
Stalker	Tier 2 / 4 alternatives (group 1)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=24)	—	—	64,749	99.5%	not enough data
Spirit Shielding	Tier 2 / 4 alternatives (group 1)	0.5%	38.5% ± 4.2 (n=522)	—	—	64,749	99.5%	not enough data
Active Reload	Tier 2 / 4 alternatives (group 1)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=2)	—	—	64,749	99.5%	not enough data
Slowing Bullets	Tier 2 / 4 alternatives (group 1)	0.0%	insufficient data (n=19)	—	—	64,749	99.5%	not enough data
Stamina Mastery	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	0.3%	52.0% ± 5.6 (n=300)	—	—	99,646	98.5%	not enough data
Torment Pulse	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	7.5%	43.3% ± 1.1 (n=8,323)	—	—	99,646	98.5%	not enough data
Majestic Leap	Tier 3 / 7 alternatives (group 2)	0.2%	47.9% ± 7.0 (n=192)	—	—	99,646	98.5%	not enough data

Observed builds

View Most popular / Highest win rate builds for these patch, rank, scope and purchase-view settings.

Item effects

Show the item effect tables

Computed 2026-10-23 00:36 UTC from 387,129 clean matches across all ranks. Expected win chance at purchase, Win rate vs expected and Edge over same-tier items come from a model of the game before each purchase; they are separate from the win rate impact comparison.

Bought before 10 min

0 items below the selected purchase-share filter. Purchase shares use all hero games, including for phase purchases.

Purchase shares: 111,100 hero appearances. Computed 2026-10-23 00:36 UTC from 387,129 clean matches, all ranks.
Item	Tier	Bought in	Win rate when bought	Expected win chance at purchase	Win rate vs expected	vs hero	Edge over same-tier items
Spirit Strike	1	0.2%	53.4% ± 7.3 (n=176)	49.5%	+3.9 pp	+4.4 pp	+4.2 pp
Spirit Resilience	3	0.1%	57.8% ± 8.8 (n=116)	49.5%	+8.2 pp	+8.7 pp	+2.7 pp
Healbane	2	6.7%	55.2% ± 1.1 (n=7,413)	51.8%	+3.4 pp	+6.2 pp	+2.0 pp
Spirit Lifesteal	2	0.3%	52.3% ± 5.8 (n=285)	49.3%	+3.0 pp	+3.2 pp	+1.6 pp
Enchanter's Emblem	2	2.5%	51.4% ± 1.9 (n=2,756)	48.9%	+2.5 pp	+2.3 pp	+1.1 pp
Sprint Boots	1	67.6%	49.9% ± 0.4 (n=75,119)	49.3%	+0.6 pp	+0.8 pp	+0.9 pp
Cold Front	2	47.8%	51.4% ± 0.4 (n=53,149)	49.2%	+2.2 pp	+2.4 pp	+0.9 pp
Torment Pulse	3	16.5%	53.1% ± 0.7 (n=18,380)	47.2%	+5.9 pp	+4.0 pp	+0.4 pp
Extra Spirit	1	29.8%	50.7% ± 0.5 (n=33,063)	50.7%	+0.0 pp	+1.7 pp	+0.3 pp
Superior Duration	3	0.1%	58.5% ± 7.9 (n=147)	52.6%	+5.9 pp	+9.5 pp	+0.3 pp

10–20 min

0 items below the selected purchase-share filter. Purchase shares use all hero games, including for phase purchases.

Purchase shares: 111,100 hero appearances. Computed 2026-10-23 00:36 UTC from 387,129 clean matches, all ranks.
Item	Tier	Bought in	Win rate when bought	Expected win chance at purchase	Win rate vs expected	vs hero	Edge over same-tier items
Spirit Burn	4	0.4%	65.5% ± 4.3 (n=461)	53.3%	+12.2 pp	+16.5 pp	+5.7 pp
Heroic Aura	3	0.2%	58.0% ± 5.9 (n=269)	50.7%	+7.3 pp	+8.9 pp	+4.3 pp
Scourge	4	1.3%	62.9% ± 2.5 (n=1,430)	52.8%	+10.0 pp	+13.8 pp	+3.5 pp
Escalating Exposure	4	1.4%	63.1% ± 2.4 (n=1,561)	53.3%	+9.8 pp	+14.1 pp	+3.3 pp
Enchanter's Emblem	2	8.1%	50.6% ± 1.0 (n=8,944)	48.1%	+2.4 pp	+1.5 pp	+2.1 pp
Spirit Resilience	3	10.7%	52.8% ± 0.9 (n=11,848)	48.0%	+4.8 pp	+3.8 pp	+1.8 pp
Healbane	2	45.7%	49.9% ± 0.4 (n=50,774)	48.2%	+1.7 pp	+0.9 pp	+1.4 pp
Extra Health	1	11.2%	49.2% ± 0.9 (n=12,477)	49.0%	+0.2 pp	+0.2 pp	+1.0 pp
Mystic Vulnerability	2	7.9%	53.5% ± 1.0 (n=8,736)	52.3%	+1.2 pp	+4.4 pp	+0.9 pp
Witchmail	4	0.6%	59.2% ± 3.7 (n=669)	51.9%	+7.3 pp	+10.1 pp	+0.8 pp

20 min or later

0 items below the selected purchase-share filter. Purchase shares use all hero games, including for phase purchases.

Purchase shares: 111,100 hero appearances. Computed 2026-10-23 00:36 UTC from 387,129 clean matches, all ranks.
Item	Tier	Bought in	Win rate when bought	Expected win chance at purchase	Win rate vs expected	vs hero	Edge over same-tier items
Crushing Fists	4	0.1%	60.4% ± 9.9 (n=91)	50.5%	+10.0 pp	+11.4 pp	+7.2 pp
Magic Carpet	4	1.1%	59.7% ± 2.8 (n=1,180)	52.8%	+6.9 pp	+10.7 pp	+4.1 pp
Mystic Vulnerability	2	21.3%	55.8% ± 0.6 (n=23,709)	55.0%	+0.8 pp	+6.7 pp	+2.5 pp
Escalating Exposure	4	32.0%	59.6% ± 0.5 (n=35,596)	54.5%	+5.1 pp	+10.5 pp	+2.3 pp
Alchemical Fire	3	0.7%	49.1% ± 3.5 (n=791)	47.3%	+1.7 pp	+0.0 pp	+2.3 pp
Cheat Death	4	1.6%	60.4% ± 2.3 (n=1,764)	55.3%	+5.0 pp	+11.3 pp	+2.3 pp
Spirit Burn	4	13.9%	60.0% ± 0.8 (n=15,479)	55.2%	+4.8 pp	+10.9 pp	+2.0 pp
Scourge	4	33.5%	57.6% ± 0.5 (n=37,196)	52.9%	+4.7 pp	+8.6 pp	+2.0 pp
Grit	1	1.8%	53.4% ± 2.2 (n=1,960)	54.4%	-1.0 pp	+4.3 pp	+1.5 pp
Witchmail	4	22.0%	57.1% ± 0.6 (n=24,463)	53.0%	+4.1 pp	+8.1 pp	+1.3 pp

How we calculate this

In observed win rates, ± shows half the width of the likely range; n is the number of games or appearances counted. Percentage-point differences are labeled pp.

Grades use win rates adjusted toward the overall average to reduce small-sample swings. Difference from the corresponding population average, in percentage points: S at or above +3; A at or above +1 and < +3; B > -1 and < +1; C > -3 and at or below -1; D at or below -3. A dash means not enough data. The displayed win rate is the observed rate; grades use the adjusted rate. Hero-summary grades use all ranks, clean matches for this patch.

Win rate when bought is the observed match win rate among buyers. Win rate impact compares eligible same-tier alternatives in the same purchase phase after giving them a common mix of purchase times, team wealth leads and ranks. Compare only rows with the same alternatives and mix; numbered groups distinguish different comparisons when a table contains more than one. The reference includes the item itself; zero is the reference average. Data covered is the share of the intended comparison mix supported by the data, counted in groups of purchase time, team wealth lead and rank.

The likely range is a 95% interval accounting for purchases from the same match, conditional on the chosen alternatives and mix. Likely helps means the entire range is above zero; likely hurts means below zero; unclear includes zero. Not enough data means a comparison failed its sample, support or display requirements. These associations do not establish cause, account for unmeasured differences or repeated players across matches, predict future patches, or add up to a build win rate. Filtering items does not change the comparison groups, weights or estimates.

Expected win chance at purchase is the average win chance a separate model of the game gave the buyers just before they bought. Win rate vs expected is the buyers' actual win rate minus that expected chance, measured on the same data used to fit the model. Edge over same-tier items is that difference minus the average difference for same-tier items on this hero in the same phase; it is observational, not the win rate impact comparison. Purchase shares use all hero appearances. Rows are limited to 10 per comparison tier.

Win chance effect comes from a statistical model over clean matches of this patch and match tier. It is shown in percentage points above a 50% baseline from this hero's side: positive means this hero's side wins more often. Tables are sorted by the underlying model coefficient.